Mutt DRK-01 125 vs Yamaha XSR 125

Compare Specifications of Mutt DRK-01 125 and Yamaha XSR 125

Selected Bikes

Mutt DRK-01 125
Mutt DRK-01 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XSR 125
Yamaha XSR 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke Single Cylinder Liquid-cooled DOHC Liquid-cooled, OHC, 1-cylinder, 4-stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Electronic fuel injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 13.5 PS @ 10,000 rpm (10KW) 15 PS @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque 11NM @ 7,500 rpm 11.5 NM @ 8,000 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity 180 Kg --
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission -- Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- LCD round instrument
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17 (tubeless)
Rear -- 140/70-17 (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Custom 18 Inch Saw-Tooth Rims Alloy
Brakes
Front Single hydraulic caliper, four pistons dia 25 mm, Floating single disc, dia 320mm Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 267 mm
Rear Single hydraulic caliper, twin-pistons dia 25 mm Floating single disc, dia 240mm Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front Upside-down telescopic fork dia 51 mm / dia 37 mm Upside down fork, Ø 37 mm
130mm
Rear Twin Piggyback Reservoir with adjustable preload Swingarm
110mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Red line
Impact yellow
Techblack


Physical Specs
Length 2041 mm 1960 mm
Width 791 mm 800 mm
Height 1094 mm 1065 mm
Weight -- 140 kg
Seat Height 795 815
Wheelbase 1364 mm 1330 mm
Ground Clearance -- 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 11 litres
Overview
Features -- - An EU5-compliant 125 engine that sets standards
- Puristic and timeless XSR style
- 37mm inverted forks
- Stylish: the tires with the block profile
- High-tech: LED headlights and rear lights
- High-strength and lightweight Deltabox frame
- Premium Features
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 2.1 litres/100 km
CO2 emission: 47g/km
Steering head angle: 26º
Trailing: 95mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3822