Polygon Urbano 5 vs Rondo Ruut AL1 2X

Compare Specifications of Polygon Urbano 5 and Rondo Ruut AL1 2X

Selected Bikes

Polygon Urbano 5
Polygon Urbano 5

Brand:

Model:

Rondo Ruut AL1 2X
Rondo Ruut AL1 2X

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Drivetrain -- Wide Range Shimano GRX Drivetrain
Frame ALX Foldable Frame w/ Safety Lock & Magnetic RUUT 2.0 CUSTOM FORMED AL6061-T6
Stem Alloy Foldable Stem Adjustable Height:315-350mm RONDO 80 MM(S), 90 MM(M,L), 110 MM(XL)
Handle Bar Alloy w: 560MM Barbore: 25.4MM Bend: 6 Degree RONDO FLARE 400 MM (XS), 420 MM(S), 440 MM(M,L), 460 MM(XL)
Fork ALX Rigid Fork TWINTIP 2.0 CARBON
Seatpost Alloy 34.9x580mm w/ Shim to 36.4mm RONDO 350 X 27.2
Grip -- VELO COMFORT TAPE
Crankset 2-Piece Alloy Crank 53T W/ Single Chain Guard RONDO 46/30 165 MM (XS) 170 MM(S), 172.5 MM(M,L), 175 MM (XL)
Pedals Foldable PP Cage Pedal w/ Reflector --
Chain KMC X9 9-Speed SHIMANO KCN4601
Shifters Shimano Altus SL-M2010 9-Speed SHIMANO GRX RX400
Saddle Entity Saddle FABRIC SCOOP FLAT
Headset ZS 44/28.6 | ZS 44/30 --
Derailleur Rear Shimano Sora RD-R3000 9-Speed SHIMANO RD RX400
Hub Front -- RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Hub Rear -- RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Cassette Shimano CS-HG200 11-34T 9-Speed SHIMANO HG-50-10 11-36 10 SPEED
Bottom Bracket Threaded BB for 2-Piece Crank PF 86/SHIMANO BB RS500
Tyres
Front Vee Speedster 20"x1 3/8" WTB RIDDLER 700C X 37/SCHWALBE G-ONE ALLROUND 650B X 40 (XS)
Rear Vee Speedster 20"x1 3/8" WTB RIDDLER 700C X 37/SCHWALBE G-ONE ALLROUND 650B X 40 (XS)
Wheel / RIM 20" Alloy Double Wall 28H RONDO ALUMINIUM 622-23/584-23(XS) TUBELESS COMPATIBLE
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disc Brake Caliper IS SHIMANO GRX R400
Rear Hydraulic Disc Brake Caliper IS SHIMANO GRX R400
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Green
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 10.3 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Sizes : XS, S, M, L, XL
Axle front : 100/12mm/thread 1.5
Axle rear : 142/12mm/thread 1.5

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

946