Suzuki 2024 V-Strom 650 vs Yamaha R6 GYTR

Compare Specifications of Suzuki 2024 V-Strom 650 and Yamaha R6 GYTR

Selected Bikes

Suzuki 2024 V-Strom 650
Suzuki 2024 V-Strom 650

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R6 GYTR
Yamaha R6 GYTR

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 645.00 cc 599.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 90 degree V-twin 4-valve, 4-stroke, EURO4, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, Forward-inclined in-line 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Wet sump wet sump
Clutch Wet, multi-plate type --
Fuel System Fuel injection, SDTV-equipped Fuel injection
Ignition Electronic ignition (transistorized) Transistor
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 118.4 PS @ 14,500 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 61.7 NM @ 10,500 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission 6-speed constant mesh Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Chain, RK525SMOZ8, 118 links Chain
Display -- Digital
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp 12V 65W (H9 high-beam) and 12V 55W (H7 low-beam) LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 110/80R19 M/C (59V), tubeless 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) Tubeless
Rear 150/70R17 M/C (69V), tubeless 180/55 ZR17M/C (73W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 19" front & 17" rear wheel Alloy
Brakes
Front Tokico, 2-piston calipers, twin disc, ABS-equipped Hydraulic double disc brake, Ø 320 mm
Rear Nissin, 1-piston, single disc, ABS-equipped Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø 43 mm 120mm
Rear Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped Suspension strut linked via a lever system, swing arm 120mm
Colors Available
Colors Solid Iron Gray Primer White


Physical Specs
Length 2275 mm 2040 mm
Width 835 mm 695 mm
Height 1405 mm 1150 mm
Kerb Weight 213 190
Seat Height 835 850
Wheelbase 1560 mm 1375 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- -GYTR engine parts
-GYTR electronics
-GYTR suspension parts
-Compact Deltabox frame with a lightweight magnesium rear frame
-Lightweight aluminum tank
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 6.6L/100km
CO2 emission: 154g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9353