Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 3 vs Voodoo Nakisi Bike

Compare Specifications of Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 3 and Voodoo Nakisi Bike

Selected Bikes

Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 3
Trek Domane AL 2 Gen 3

Brand:

Model:

Voodoo Nakisi Bike
Voodoo Nakisi Bike

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Seating Capacity -- 1
Frame 100 Series Alpha Aluminium, tapered head tube, internal routing, mudguard mounts, DuoTrap S-compatible, flat-mount disc, 142x12 mm thru axle Size: S (49.5cm), M (51.5cm), L (53.5cm), XL (55.5cm)
Stem Size: 44
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 70 mm length
Size: 49
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 80 mm length
Size: 52, 54
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 90 mm length
Size: 56, 58
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 100 mm length
Size: 61
Bontrager Elite, 31.8 mm, Blendr-compatible, 7-degree, 110 mm length
--
Handle Bar Size: 44, 49
Bontrager Comp VR-S, alloy, 31.8 mm, 81 mm reach, 118 mm drop, 38 cm width
Size: 52
Bontrager Comp VR-S, alloy, 31.8 mm, 81 mm reach, 118 mm drop, 40 cm width
Size: 54, 56
Bontrager Comp VR-C, alloy, 31.8 mm, 100 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 42 cm width
Size: 58, 61
Bontrager Comp VR-C, alloy, 31.8 mm, 100 mm reach, 124 mm drop, 44 cm width
Voodoo Alloy butted, (S-width : 400mm, M/L-width:420mm, XL-width:440mm),
Fork Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Domane AL carbon, tapered alloy steerer, internal brake routing, fender mounts, flat mount disc, 12x100mm thru axle
700C, Threadless ,28(1-1/8"), offset 50
Seatpost Size: 44, 49
Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 27.2 mm, 8 mm offset, 250 mm length
Size: 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Comp, 6061 alloy, 27.2 mm, 8 mm offset, 330 mm length
Voodoo Alloy 27.2, (S - 300mm), (M/L - 350mm), (XL - 400mm)
Grip -- Black, lock-on
Crankset Size: 44
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 165 mm length
Size: 49, 52, 54
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 170 mm length
Size: 56, 58, 61
Shimano RS200, 50/34 (compact), 175 mm length
--
Chain Shimano Sora HG71, 8 speed KMC X9, 9 speed, 1/2'X11/128'
Shifters Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Shimano Claris ST-R2000-R, 8 speed, right
Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Shimano Claris ST-R2000-L, 8 speed, left
--
Saddle Size: 44, 49, 52
Bontrager Verse Comp, steel rails, 155 mm width
Size: 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Verse Comp, steel rails, 145 mm width
--
Headset FSA Integrated, sealed cartridge bearing, 1-1/8" top, 1.5" bottom Steel, threadless, semi-integrated, 44/44,1-1/8"
Derailleur Front Shimano Claris R2000, 31.8 mm clamp Shimano FD-R3000 (Sora) , 9 speed
Derailleur Rear Shimano Claris R2000, medium cage, 34T max cog Shimano RD-R3000 (Sora), 9 speed
Hub Front Formula RX-512 alloy, 6-bolt, 100x12 mm thru axle Alloy, disc brake, boost 112mm
Hub Rear Formula RX-142 alloy, 6-bolt, Shimano 11-speed freehub, 142x12 mm thru axle Alloy, boost 148 through-axle
Cassette Shimano HG31, CS-HG31, 11-32, 8 speed Shimano, 9 speed, 11-34t
Chainrings 1x: 42T, 2x: 50/34 --
Bottom Bracket Shimano UN300, 68 mm, threaded cartridge, 110 mm spindle Thread bc 37X24T
Tyres
Front Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite, wire bead, 60 tpi, 700x32 mm Maxxis Ardent, 60TPI, folding bead
Rear Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite, wire bead, 60 tpi, 700x32 mm --
Wheel / RIM Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Affinity Disc, Tubeless Ready, 24-hole, 21 mm width, Presta valve
Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Paradigm SL, Tubeless Ready, 24-hole, 21 mm width, Presta valve
Size: 44, 49, 52, 54, 56, 58, 61
Bontrager Paradigm, Tubeless Ready, 24-hole, 21 mm width, Presta valve
700c, Alloy, double wall, 32H
Brakes
Front Tektro C550 mechanical disc brake, dual piston, flat-mount, 160 mm rotor Tektro, MD-C400 (Mira), rotor 160mm
Rear Tektro C550 mechanical disc brake, dual piston, flat-mount, 160 mm rotor Tektro, MD-C400 (Mira), rotor 160mm
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 10.76 kg --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Chainset: Steel black 48/32T (S/M - 170mm, L/XL - 175mm)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1686